Skip to main content

Asia Sentinel: Malaysian Politics today

The headline from Asia Sentinel dated May 26, 2020 -- Nobody to Drain the Swamp,
Ambition takes precedence over governance as leaders squabble.

Summary of a coterie of geriatric leaders who are wrecking the stability while the world is fighting with the pandemic, according to this article.

a) 94-year-old:
Resigned as the 7th PM in February, then tried to reclaim the job.
Seen as traitor by the Malay middle class -- no credibility left.

b) 72-year-old:
Sitting as the leader of the opposition in May 18 parliament.
Showing his immaturity and naked ambition, trying to rebuild the on-again-off-again PH coalition.

c) 73-year-old:
Elected by Agong as the 8th PM in March, after leaving PH coalition to join with so-called PN coalition.
Has been going all out to add to his razor-thin 114-109 majority in May 18 parliament.

d) 66-year-old:
Lost 2018 election and stepped down as the 6th PM.
Allegedly was responsible for the biggest financial scandal in the country's history -- continues to act as a spoiler to PH coalition. 


One clear wreckage in PH coalition:

"However, it appears since the one-day sitting of parliament on May 18 that Muhyiddin has been picking up numbers, with the apparent fracture between Anwar and Mahathir costing Pakatan Harapan any chance of regaining the numbers to command a majority in parliament. Hopes are fading fast for any vote of no confidence that would bring down Muhyiddin's coalition, as it is not even clear who would be Pakatan Harapan’s preferred prime minister, Anwar or Mahathir." 


Vote of no-confidence aiming towards the 8th PM expected in next parliament session in July.
While the other leaders within PN from UMNO and PAS are eyeing on his precedence also, as suggested in this article,
"He is only regarded as a seat-warmer for someone who hasn't shown himself or herself yet."


Source: https://www.asiasentinel.com/p/malaysian-politics-nobody-to-drain

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Vulnerable is our Democratic

I was reading an interview article where Lee Kuan Yew was discussing about the race-based politics in the context of Singapore and Malaysia societies in 2010.  (Source: https://says.com/my/news/lee-kuan-yew-on-race-based-politics-and-why-it-will-destroy-our-society) Singapore is a nation with Chinese as majority, whereas Malaysia with Malay as majority. While declaring Bahasa as their national language, this national leader of Singapore had attempted to implement equal opportunities policy in a multi-racial base society, despite being accused of destroying Chinese education. This is a bold move with his purpose to avoid people playing on race, language and religion cards, as he mentioned during the interview. I am wondering, is there any national leader in Malaysia will take this bold move by putting aside the race and religion differences? Well, maybe some from a very few? However, the political leaders with such mindset will hardly gain popular vote from the maj...

Malaysia MISS seizing the Opportunity?

While our neighbours are competing to seize opportunities from the plan to relocate US factories out of China... such headline from The Economist might scare off our potential investors... https://www.asiasentinel.com/p/indonesia-dreams-of-an-investment https://www.economist.com/asia/2020/05/23/malaysias-shaky-government-dodges-a-no-confidence-motion

Dilemma amid the Pandemic

As of April 28, around 4.2 billion people ( 54% of the global population ), representing almost 60% of global GDP, were subject to complete or partial lockdowns all over the world. (source:  https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2020/context-a-world-in-lockdown ) While countries like UK (at earlier phase), Sweden and Brazil are responding with more relaxed measures by placing economic activities as their priority over public health, majority of the press media are condemning such crisis management which seems to aim towards herd immunity . Indeed, it is controversial to trade-off between Economy and Public Health . In the eyes of business people, GDP performance and financial figure are what they are judging at. From social economy perspective, we tend to monetise each human's life and well-being. However, there are some parts of the world where the people would rather die of virus than die of famine, for example in India. People said this virus does not discri...